Commonwealth v. Clark
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, J.:
¶ 1 We granted en banc review in this case, sua sponte, to address the question of the appealability of a conviction where no penalty has been imposed. Appellant was convicted of two counts each of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and criminal conspiracy. 1 The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of imprisonment for each count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, but found him “guilty without further imposition of sentence” on the conspiracy counts. (N.T., 10/9/97, at 75)
¶2 Before the three-judge panel assigned to hear the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ShoatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HaskinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MartuscelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. FurnessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.