Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clark

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2000PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 We granted en banc review in this case, sua sponte, to address the question of the appealability of a conviction where no penalty has been imposed. Appellant was convicted of two counts each of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and criminal conspiracy. 1 The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of imprisonment for each count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, but found him “guilty without further imposition of sentence” on the conspiracy counts. (N.T., 10/9/97, at 75)

¶2 Before the three-judge panel assigned to hear the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. ShoatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. HaskinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartuscelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. FurnessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API