Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Richardson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 23, 1990No. ACMR 8801211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM: *

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of violating a lawful general regulation, attempted espionage, unauthorized sale of military property, unauthorized disposal of military property, and larceny of government property (two specifications) in violation of Articles 92, 106a, 108, and 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 906a, 908 and 921 (1982 and Supp. III). His approved sentence includes a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for ten years, forfeiture of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gorin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. ByrdUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. HeineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SquillacoteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. AnzaloneU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. RichardsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. KappleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. SombolayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API