Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Duluth v. School District No. 15
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 13, 1928No. 26,432PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The purpose of this action is to compel the application as they are available of the funds of the defendant school district to some of its outstanding warrants held by plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion, in the alternative, for amended conclusions of law or, in default thereof, a new trial.
Three warrants are involved, two for $500 each and one for $2,080. They were either originally issued or soon after issue transferred to the Peoples State Bank of Duluth. All were thereafter indorsed to plaintiff. There was an admitted balance due on the warrants at the time suit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State Nat. Bank of Springfield v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- La Due v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Frost National Bank v. Nicholas & BarreraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- First National Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 28Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Boston Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.