Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Russell
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.
The defendant in error employed Fred C. Herbst, a contractor, to erect a brick building and to move and repair another building for a price of $18,317.80, the contractor to pay out of this sum for all the labor and all the material used in the construction of the brick building and the repair of the other. The contract between these two parties was reduced to writing, and, among other things, this language was used:
“One Herbst and the Defendant in error, Russell, entered into a builder’s contract whereby said Herbst agreed to furnish all material and labor and to perform the work specified in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ryan v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Bullard v. NortonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Robertson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Brunk v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. E. E. Cloer General Contractor, Inc., and United States Guarantee CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. BettesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Allied Bank of Texas v. Plaza Deville AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. F. Renondo & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- ALLIED BANK OF TX v. Plaza DeVille Assoc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.