Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Bettes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1966No. 16709PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAUDE WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $1,178,770 in favor of T. J. Bettes Company against New Amsterdam Casualty Company. The recovery of T. J. Bettes Company was upon alleged obligation of four bonds executed by L. A. Peterson, Inc., as principal, and New Amsterdam Casualty Company as surety, said bonds being conditional upon the faithful performance by L. A. Peterson, Inc., of contracts for the construction of buildings located in Virginia and New York.

The factual background of the parties and subject matter involved in this litigation is so complex that the record…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Southwest Savings Association v. DunaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Trainor Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Kidd v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance Co. v. North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Augusta Court Co-Owners' Ass'n v. Levin, Roth & Kasner, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co. v. Scherer, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Borden Metal Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Campbell Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API