Legal Opinion
Donaldson & Yahn v. Benight
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 7, 1924No. 13701PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
The city of Perry contracted with Alderson and Knox by separate agreements to construct one clam and reservoir, one pipe line, and one filtration plant. The contracts required the builder to give a bond for the protection of the labor and materialmen. In addition to the bond and for the protection of- the same class of persons, each contract covering the construction of the three divisions of the project, contained the following pro-visions:
“If at any time during the progress of said labor the contractor shall fail or neglect to pay for labor performed or material…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- Bay v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Sample v. HaleNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christian v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- City of Lawton v. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Berry v. CooleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Plunkett v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.