Legal Opinion
Eisenson v. Home Ins.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided May 23, 1949No. Civ. Nos. 187, 188PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DE VANE, District Judge.
These suits are on two Business Interruption Insurance policies. Each policy is identical with the other and each policy insured plaintiffs for one-half the total losses sustained. 'These cases were consolidated for trial and' this Memorandum Decision covers both cases.
The policies cover business interruption resulting from fire. Item I, in the sum of $12,000.00, covers (a) the net profit which is thereby prevented from being earned, and, (b) such charges and other expenses, including salaries of 'officers, executives, department managers, employees under contract and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Jacksonville Oil MillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Stuyvesant Ins. v. Jacksonville Oil MillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Employers'liability Assur. Corp. v. Royals Farm Sup., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Dictiomatic, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
- Satuloff v. American Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974