Legal Opinion

Bowie v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 1973No. [No. 238, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This case is a sequel to Kaylor v. Wilson, 260 Md. 707, 273 A. 2d 185 (1971). There, this Court decided that an enrolled decretal order dated May 4, 1938 which finally ratified a tax sale could not be collaterally attacked for fraud in a trespass quare clausum fregit action. A substantial portion of the material facts here are matters of record and are undisputed. In fact, by stipulation, the parties agree that our opinion in Wilson, supra, 260 Md. at 709, accurately recites the history and the findings of fact by the trial judge in the previous law suit and correctly traces the chain of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McKeever v. Washington Heights Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Brashears v. CollisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. O'Connor v. EstevezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Wooddy v. WooddyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Inlet Associates v. Assateague House Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Wimmer v. WimmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API