Legal Opinion
Exelixis, Inc. v. Kappos
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 28, 2013No. 1:12cv574 (LMB/TRJ)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Exelixis, Inc. (“Exelixis”) has sued David J. Kappos, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), under 35 U.S.C. § 154 and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., claiming that the PTO improperly determined the amount of patent term adjustment (“PTA”) to which one of Exelixis’s patents is entitled. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the PTO’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 16] will be granted and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Timex V.I., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abraxis Bioscience, LLC v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mohsenzadeh v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014