Legal Opinion

Mohsenzadeh v. Lee

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 19, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-cv-00824-GBL-TCBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 10 and 13). This case concerns the determination of patent term adjustment (“PTA”) for Plaintiff Hossein Mohsenzadeh’s divisional patents, U.S. Patent No. 8,352,862 (“the '362 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 8,401,963 (“the '963 patent”). The issue before the Court is whether divisional patents should receive PTA that arose due to a delay in the issuance of a restriction requirement in their parent patent’s application.

The Court GRANTS Defendant’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. UCB, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Wonderful Real Estate Development LLC v. Laborers International Union of North America Local 220District Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API