Legal Opinion

Marble v. Butler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1930No. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 34,586PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, George N. Marble, and his parents, defendants Ambrose I. Marble and May Marble, entered into a land contract for the purchase of property in the township of Battle Creek, county of Calhoun, for the sum of $6,000. Defendant Herbert E. Butler acquired the vendors’ interest in said contract. Through an initial payment of $4,030.16 and subsequent monthly payments on the contract, the balance due defendant Butler as assignee of the vendors in said contract had been reduced to less than $1,500 at the time of the filing of the bill of complaint in this cause. Defendant Butler’s interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hull v. HostettlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Curry v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Letinsky v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pavella v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Flynn v KorneffelMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mitchell v. DahlbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API