Grimaud v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
In the 1998 general election, the majority of the electorate approved amendments to Article I, § 6 (trial by jury) and Article I, § 14 (prisoners to be bailable; habeas corpus) of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
*404Article I, § 14 (prisoners to be bailable; habeas corpus):
Before amendment, Article I, § 14 provided:
All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offenses when the proof is evident or presumption great; and the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Sweeney v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Fine v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Commonwealth v. TruesdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jubelirer v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Senator Jay Costa v. Sec. Pedro A. CortesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Senator Jay Costa, Pa. 43rd District v. Secretary Pedro A. CortesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Sprague v. CortesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.