Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sloan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 2006No. 91 EM 2005PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

Keon Sloan (Appellant) sought release from pretrial confinement in accord with Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(E) 1 after being held in jail for in excess of 180 days. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granted the petition but placed Appellant under house arrest with electronic monitoring as a condition of release. Appellant argues that the trial court was without authority to attach these or any conditions to his release. Following the Superior Court’s denial of Appellant’s petition for review of the trial court’s order, Appellant petitioned for review before this Court.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. CousinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Walker, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. SamuelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API