Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1974No. 1302PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiffs claim defendants applied a dangerously slick coating of Gilsonite road surface preservative to U.S. Highway 54, south of Alamogordo, causing the automobile accident for which they now seek damages. In an amended motion for summary judgment defendants claimed no Gilsonite was applied to the section of the road where the accident occurred. See § 21-1-1(56), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1970). That motion was granted as to all claims and parties. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.
A finding that Gilsonite was applied to the highway at the point where the accident occurred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Kelly v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Gallegos Ex Rel. Estate of Gallegos v. WallaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Montoya v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hyden v. LAW FIRM OF McCORMICK, ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Knapp v. Fraternal Order of EaglesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Griego v. GriecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mills v. KellyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wood v. Angel Fire Ski Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.