Legal Opinion

Griego v. Grieco

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1977No. 2582PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment granted defendants based upon two findings:

1. That the testimony of Dr. Thomas Wachtel is not competent to establish the applicable standard of care or breach thereof by the defendant, A. J. Grieco, or the defendant, Cibola General Hospital.

2. That there is no genuine issue of material fact and the defendant, A. J. Grieco and the defendant, Cibola General Hospital, are entitled to judgment as a matter of law in their favor

We reverse as to Grieco and affirm as to Cibola General Hospital.

A. Dr. Thomas Wachtel was competent to testify.

Plain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northwestern University v. CrispSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. In the Matter of EldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Turner v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Cyrilla Murphy and George H. Murphy v. Harold L. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marchiondo v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ruiz v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. StillsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. ConocoPhillips Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Shamburger v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API