Legal Opinion
Hull v. FONCK
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 2010No. AC 31147PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
General Statutes § 20-327b 1 requires a seller of residential property to execute a report documenting his knowledge of specified aspects of the condition of the property. The issue in this case is whether a disclaimer in the contract for the sale of the property is a bar to an action to recover damages from the seller for a negligent misrepresentation in this mandated report. Because the negligent misrepresentation concerned a defect in the property that was known to the seller and not readily discoverable by the purchaser at the time of the conveyance, the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Gibson v. CapanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Kramer v. PetisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Holly Hill Holdings v. LowmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ARMOUR Capital Management LP v. SS&C Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Doe v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Doe v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024