Legal Opinion

People v. Welmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Hillsdale; Lane, J. Fred Welmer and Warren Briggs were convicted of violating the local option law.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

This case comes to this court from the Hillsdale circuit' on exceptions before sentence. The respondents were charged with the violation of the local option law of that county, and, on a trial before a jury, were convicted. The only point we need consider is the refusal of the court to allow to each respondent the number pf peremptory challenges to jurors each would be entitled to if tried separately. After the defense had challenged five of the jurors peremptorily, and such jurors had been excused by the court, they then challenged one more juror peremptorily, and sought to excuse him from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DureinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, Gratiot, De Quindre and Mullett StreetsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Yonkus v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. AntkoviakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Levyn v. KoppinMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API