State v. Durein
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Shawnee District Court. Information, jointly charging Frank Durein and Conrad Kreipe with unlawful sales of intoxicating liquors.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Shawnee District Court. Information, jointly charging Frank Durein and Conrad Kreipe with unlawful sales of intoxicating liquors. Trial at the May Term, 1882, of the district court, when the jury rendered the following verdict, to wit: “We, the jury, find the defendant Frank Durein guilty in the nineteenth count as charged in the information, and not guilty in the other counts as charged in the information; and as to the defendant Conrad Kreipe, we, the jury, are unable to agree.” New trial denied, and judgment upon the verdict, as follows: “That defendant Frank Durein do pay a…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by '
Brewer, J.:
The principal question in this case is this: A single information was filed, charging the defendant and one Conrad Kreipe with the sale of intoxicating liquors contrary to law. When the case was called for trial they demanded separate trials, which demand was refused. A jury being called, each defendant demanded four peremptory challenges, the number he would be entitled to if tried separately. The court refused this demand. The jury found appellant guilty, and disagreed as to his co-defendant. Now the error complained of is the ruling of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MarchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Stroh v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Cruce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- State v. StoughtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DreanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Lane v. FennNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. WelmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. JustusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- People v. CarusoMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.