Legal Opinion
Romang v. Cordell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 1952No. 35395PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an original action in this court wherein the petitioner, Richard E. Romang, a voter and taxpayer of the State of Oklahoma, a resident of Garfield county and a State Representative therefrom, seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent, J. William Cordell, Secretary of the Election Board of the State of Oklahoma, to refuse to accept and file certain notifications and declarations of candidacy for nomination and election as members of the House of Representatives because of the alleged invalidity and unconstitutionality of parts of the 1951 act of the Legislature…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Jones v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Matter of N.Y. Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Fergus v. MarksIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Dank v. BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Radford v. GaryDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Tayrien v. DoggettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- Jones v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.