Legal Opinion
Radford v. Gary
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1956No. Civ. 7144PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
This three-judge court was convened under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2281, to hear *542the complaint of the plaintiff to the effect that the existing apportionment statutes of the State of Oklahoma violate the plain mandate of the Oklahoma Constitution and operate to deprive him of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The essential allegations are that the complainant is a citizen of Oklahoma and resident and voter in the most populous county in the State; that because of a shift in the population since…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Moss v. BurkhartDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1962
- Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1959
- Reynolds v. State Election BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.