Legal Opinion

Jones v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1943No. 31322PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an original action brought by petitioner, Jenkin Lloyd Jones, to test the validity of the various legislative apportionment acts enacted since the adoption of the Constitution. Petitioner alleges all of such acts to be contrary to express constitutional provisions, and seeks (unless a valid law be enacted meanwhile) to require the next election to be held under the apapportionment as made by the Constitution, as well as to restrain the payment of compensation to legislators already elected under the allegedly invalid laws.

It has been stipulated that petitioner is an elector and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Lamb v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API