Legal Opinion

Schenley Import Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 2, 1940No. C. D. 310PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

The merchandise herein consists of certain sherry wine imported in casks or butts. The entire shipment consisted of 229 butts. One case, number 272, was damaged in transit. Immediately after the vessel docked and prior to delivery the wine was officially gauged. The return of the gauge under cask 272 shows a capacity of 133 gallons and an outage of 129 gallons, said barrel was reported leaking at chimb and. with a broken stave. The collector assessed duty upon the capacity of the cask less an outage of 2 % per centum, or upon 129.68 gallons, no allowance being made for leakage or…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alfred Hart Distilleries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Le Sage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Protest 109848-K of Washington State Liquor Control BoardUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Protests 109836-K of Spanish American Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  5. Protests 9872-K of Marr Duplicator Co.United States Customs Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API