Legal Opinion

Rehkoph v. REMS, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2002No. Nos. 00-4057, 00-4089, 00-4254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COHN, District Judge.

This is a breach of contract case. Plaintiff-Appellant John Rehkoph (Rehkoph) appeals from the district court’s grant of Defendant-Appellees REMS, Inc.’s (REMS) motion for summary judgment because Rehkoph’s claims were barred by laches. REMS cross-appeals the district court’s decision that Rehkoph’s claims were not time-barred by a four year statute of limitations under Ohio Revised Code § 2305.06. For the reasons that follow we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment and remand the case to the district court for further action.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. PadgettOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. MuethingOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Mallory v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. James T. Clark v. Stapleton Corporation, a Corporation Dba Stapleton Ladder Co., and R.E.L. Products, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruby Blackmon v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API