Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dreamy Hollow Apartments Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 25, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts alleged in the complaint and admitted by the demurrer, insofar as they are essential to an understanding of our decision, will be stated in simplified and abbreviated form. The *703plaintiff had occupied an apartment in the named defendant’s apartment house, in Norwalk, under a written lease reserving a monthly rental of $155. During his period of occupancy, he had made payments of rent aggregating $577.50. There was no suggestion that the payments were not voluntary. The defendants had failed to obtain from the building inspector of the city of Norwalk a certificate of occupancy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Anselmo v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Dennis v. ShawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Second National Bank of New Haven v. LoftusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Gregory v. BrettConnecticut Superior Court · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Dreamy Hollow Apartments Corp. v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  3. Groton Townhouse Apartments v. MarderConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
  4. Groton Townhouse Apts. v. MarderConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
  5. Denino v. Valenti, No. Cvnh 9108-4608 (Sep. 30, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API