Legal Opinion

Todaro v. Township of Union

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-4875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Brian Todaro, et al., and defendant Township of Union. The Court has decided this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on count one of the amended complaint will be denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be held in abeyance as to count one of the amended complaint pending the completion of certain limited discovery, and will be granted as to count two of the amended…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Solis v. Laurelbrook Sanitarium and School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Meyers v. HeffernanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  3. Mendel v. City of GibraltarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  4. Brown v. Riverside Elementary School District No. 2District Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  5. Dennis Cacalori and Denise Cacalori v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API