Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Teeple

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1975No. 92PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’BRIEN, Justice.

This appeal arises from a final decree in equity which granted appellees, George T. Boyd and Susan Frances Boyd, a prescriptive easement over the property of appellants, Aaron M. Teeple and Audrey Teeple, and which enjoined appellants from interfering with the use of this easement and further denied appellants’ counterclaim.

The facts surrounding this appeal are as follows:

On March 9, 1971, appellees filed a complaint in equity requesting a preliminary injunction to enjoin the blocking of a roadway over which they claimed a prescriptive easement. Appellants…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Lewkowicz v. BlumishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Schiff v. Upper Salford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. LarkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Adshead v. SprungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Stotsenburg v. FrostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Tioga Coal Co. v. Supermarkets General Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Martin v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API