Stotsenburg v. Frost
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
O’BRIEN, Justice.
These appeals arise from a final decree in equity affirmed by the court en banc, entered on March 25, 1974. This decree determined that a partnership did exist between appellant, Richard H. Frost, and appellee, Ralph M. Stotsenburg, and further awarded $8,984.81, plus interest, to appellee as his share of the liquidated partnership.
Two separate appeals having been filed, we shall discuss them ad seriatim.
I — No. 138 March Term, 1974 — Appeal of Richard H. Frost, individually
In this appeal appellant, Richard H. Frost, first argues that the evidence was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Sanders AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Gyger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Tax Review Board v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Boyd v. TeepleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Gold & Co. v. Northeast Theater Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Petition of ChristjohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Dasher v. DasherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.