Legal Opinion

Stotsenburg v. Frost

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1975No. 138 and 169PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’BRIEN, Justice.

These appeals arise from a final decree in equity affirmed by the court en banc, entered on March 25, 1974. This decree determined that a partnership did exist between appellant, Richard H. Frost, and appellee, Ralph M. Stotsenburg, and further awarded $8,984.81, plus interest, to appellee as his share of the liquidated partnership.

Two separate appeals having been filed, we shall discuss them ad seriatim.

I — No. 138 March Term, 1974 — Appeal of Richard H. Frost, individually

In this appeal appellant, Richard H. Frost, first argues that the evidence was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Sanders AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Gyger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Tax Review Board v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Boyd v. TeepleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Gold & Co. v. Northeast Theater Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Petition of ChristjohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Dasher v. DasherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API