Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 20, 2017No. 17-8024Unpublished

1ConcurrenceO’Brien, J.

I concur only in the result. Garcia’s inartful motion sought a sentence reduction based upon Amendment 794 to the sentencing guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce an imposed sentence if the “sentencing range .. has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission ... if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” Section IBI.1'0 of the guidelines contains the relevant policy statement: a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) is permitted only if the amendment reducing the sentencing range is listed in USSG…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. Espinoza-SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Henry AvilaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API