United States v. Henry Avila
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Mr. Avila appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for sentencing range reduction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We affirm.
The Sentencing Guidelines now permit a three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility in certain circum stances. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b) (Nov. 1, 1992) & app. C, amend. 459 (eff. Nov. 1, 1992). Mr. Avila contends that, under the rule of lenity and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the district court should reduce his sentence one level, because at the time he was sentenced, only a two-level downward adjustment was in effect.
Section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Juan Rodriguez, Zenon D. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. IvyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Harold A. Ebbole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Huckley Armstrong, A.K.A. ShortyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. DorroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. David Henry DullenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.