Legal Opinion

United States v. Henry Avila

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1993No. 93-1063PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Mr. Avila appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for sentencing range reduction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We affirm.

The Sentencing Guidelines now permit a three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility in certain circum stances. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b) (Nov. 1, 1992) & app. C, amend. 459 (eff. Nov. 1, 1992). Mr. Avila contends that, under the rule of lenity and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the district court should reduce his sentence one level, because at the time he was sentenced, only a two-level downward adjustment was in effect.

Section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Juan Rodriguez, Zenon D. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. IvyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Harold A. Ebbole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Huckley Armstrong, A.K.A. ShortyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. DorroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. David Henry DullenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API