Legal Opinion

United States v. Espinoza-Saenz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 14, 2000No. 00-2110PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Pro se appellant Gilbert Espinoza-Saenz seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his criminal sentence and the court’s denial of his request to amend his motion out of time. In order for this court to grant a certificate of appealability, defendant must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addressing the requirements of obtaining a certificate of appeala-bility under § 2253(c), the Supreme Court recently stated that a defendant must show…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Leroy Thomas, A/K/A Sheeba Leroy ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Hicks, Eric A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Herbert L. Bendolph, at No. 01-2468 United States of America v. Julio Otero, at No. 02-2624Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Rene Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API