United States v. Espinoza-Saenz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Pro se appellant Gilbert Espinoza-Saenz seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his criminal sentence and the court’s denial of his request to amend his motion out of time. In order for this court to grant a certificate of appealability, defendant must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addressing the requirements of obtaining a certificate of appeala-bility under § 2253(c), the Supreme Court recently stated that a defendant must show…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Leroy Thomas, A/K/A Sheeba Leroy ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Hicks, Eric A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Herbert L. Bendolph, at No. 01-2468 United States of America v. Julio Otero, at No. 02-2624Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Rene Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.