Legal Opinion

HAMMON STATE LINE v. Stinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1993No. 89-16397; CA A75509PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that held that the doctrine of claim preclusion bars claimant from challenging the wage rate used to calculate his temporary total disability benefits, but not his permanent total disability benefits. Claimant cross-petitions for review of the same order.

Claimant was injured in an automobile accident on December 17,1982. Employer accepted his workers’ compensation claim. Although claimant had regularly worked overtime before the accident, employer calculated his temporary total disability compensation at a rate that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Northwest Advancement, Inc. v. Wage & Hour CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. EBI Insurance v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet WorksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Kmart Corp. v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Bowman v. Esam, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Reynolds Metals v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API