Legal Opinion

Polinsky v. Violi

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2004No. 09A05-0310-CV-538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellants-defendants Mark Polin-sky and Allen Sutker (collectively, the appellants) appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration between TotalEMS and appellee-plaintiff Frank Vi-oli. Specifically, the appellants argue that they are in privity with TotalEMS and that Violi's claims against them arise solely from TotalEMS's alleged breach of Violi's Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), which requires him to arbitrate "all disputes" that arise from his employment terms. Finding that the appellants stand in privity with TotalEMS and that these disputes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. OEC-Diasonics, Inc. v. MajorIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mislenkov v. Accurate Metal Detinning, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Showboat Marina Casino Partnership v. Tonn & Blank ConstructionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Precision Homes of Indiana, Inc. v. PickfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Hemocleanse, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Roddie v. North American Manufactured Homes, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Gallagher Ex Rel. National Packaging Solutions Group Trust v. Southern Source Packaging, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. American Arbitration Ass'n v. North Miami Community SchoolsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API