California Packing Corp. v. Grove
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.
This action was commenced for the purpose of recovering an amount due from defendants for failure to deliver certain peach crops, in accordance with the terms of a written contract entered into by respondent Grove and the assignor of the plaintiff. Respondent Adelsbach was made a party by order of the lower court' for the reason that he became the purchaser of the real property upon which was grown the fruit men tioned in the contract. The plaintiff in an amended complaint sets forth the contract in full and also all the facts showing the violation thereof and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mulford v. Le FrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Lange v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Wade v. DerayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lingle Water Users' Ass'n v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Blume v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Grange Co. v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.