Legal Opinion
Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Hi-Way Equipment Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 11, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 14255PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NOEL, District Judge.
The ábove entitled and numbered cause having been tried before the Court without a jury, at the close of the evidence and after hearing arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following findings; of fact and conclusions of law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is a patent infringement action brought by Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, a corporation of Pennsylvania, against Hi-Way Equipment Company, Inc., a corporation of Texas, and the Pettibone Mulliken Corporation, a corporation of Delaware, charging infringement of U. S. Letters Patent No’s. 2,462,926 and 2,787,383. This…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1971