City of Charlotte v. Rousso
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
The order appealed from permits plaintiff City to condemn defendants’ lot situated on South Tryon Street in downtown Charlotte for a public park. In disputing the validity of the order the defendants make three contentions, all of which are manifestly without merit, and we overrule them.
Their first contention is that this suit is barred under res judicata by a judgment which dismissed a prior suit by plaintiff to condemn the same land; but this case is not based upon the same facts as the prior case and res judicata does not apply. Flynt v. Flynt, 237 N.C. 754, 75 S.E. 2d 901…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jeffress v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Flynt Ex Rel. Barefoot v. FlyntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Midland Smelting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Town of Chapel Hill v. BurchetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Chicago v. Midland Smelting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.