Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Midland Smelting Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 2008No. 1-07-3200PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE

The present action involves a parcel of property owned by defendant, Midland Smelting Company (Midland). In a prior lawsuit, plaintiff, the City of Chicago (the City), attempted to acquire the property through the use of its power of eminent domain. That action was dismissed by the circuit court as an excessive taking. The City thereafter filed the present condemnation action seeking to acquire approximately half of the property that it had sought in the original action. The trial court denied Midland’s traverse and motion to dismiss and then certified the following questions for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Raymond Hayes v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Russian Media Group, LLC v. Cable America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Apollo Real Estate Investment Fund, IV, L.P. v. GelberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Enbridge Energy, LLC v. KuerthAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API