Legal Opinion
Jordan v. USF Holland Motor Freight, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2012No. SD 31824PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, P.J.
This workers compensation appeal reprises a familiar sequence: (1) a battle of experts as to cause or extent of disability; (2) an award favoring the party whose experts were found to be more credible; and (3) an appellant who claims this is “the rare case when the award is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence” (Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 223 (Mo. banc 2003)), but does not marshal facts or develop an argument to properly support this claim.
*94The award is supported by competent and substantial evidence, and is not shown to be contrary to the overwhelming…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Houston v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Tillotson v. St. Joseph Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Proffer v. Federal Mogul Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Henley v. Fair Grove R-10 School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Nichols v. Belleview R-III School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Riley v. City of LibertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Armstrong v. Tetra Pak, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Pennewell v. Hannibal Regional HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Michael Brune, Claimant/Respondent v. Johnson Controls, a/k/a Hoover Universal, Inc., Employer/Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.