Legal Opinion

Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1955No. Civ. No. 21287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment denying injunctive relief to plaintiffs Miller, Kukta and Silberman, who alleged that a public road contiguous to their several parcels of land had been fenced in by respondent to their detriment; and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. The latter is nonappealable. Inasmuch as the appeal is based solely upon the judgment roll, we shall proceed at once to set forth the pertinent findings and conclusions here under scrutiny. In substance, they follow :*

Plaintiffs own parcels of land in Los Angeles County adjacent to a public road known as Lemp Street.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearst Publishing Co. v. AbounaderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Thornton v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API