Legal Opinion
Crucible Materials Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 2, 2010No. 597-CV-759PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
More than twelve years ago, plaintiff Crucible Materials Corporation (“plaintiff’ or “Crucible”) filed suit for, inter alia, the alleged breach of an excess liability insurance contract issued in 1968 (“the 1968 policy”). Plaintiffs complaint also included a claim for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 declaring the parties’ rights and obligations under the 1968 policy. Following four written district court opinions and an appellate decision from the Second Circuit, see Crucible Materials Corp. v. Aetna Cas.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howard E. Mandell v. The County of Suffolk and John Gallagher, Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roman Catholic Diocese v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011