Legal Opinion
Humlen v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 31, 2001No. 97-637CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This contract action is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plain*500tiff, a former government informant, contends that he is entitled to relief because the government failed to compensate him according to the oral terms of his written contract. After carefully considering both parties’ written and oral arguments, the Court concludes that plaintiffs claims for breach of contract, intentional denial of existence of contract, request for equitable accounting and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cornejo-Ortega v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Leonardo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- JGB Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Brunner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.