Legal Opinion

Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Hammer Lithograph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: This appeal arises from a condemnation proceeding brought by Rochester Urban Renewal Agency to acquire certain real property owned by the Hammer Lithograph Corporation. The court below *1045granted Hammer Lithograph a total award of $160,894, and an additional allowance of $6,435.76 for costs. We affirm the award but note that, in computing the total amount, the court made a mathematical error. The total award, as corrected, is $160,864. The additional allowance granted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dodge v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. New York State Urban Development Corp. v. GoldfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Speach v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API