Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Lee
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to respondent-appellant, in accordance with the following memorandum: These cross appeals arise from condemnation proceedings instituted by the petitioner, the Rochester Urban Renewal Agency, appropriating two parcels located at 401-411 Court Street and 96-98 Broadway to form part of the southeast loop urban renewal project. The trial court adopted the opinion of the owner’s appraiser that the highest and best use of the subject premises was not the existing use but rather for development to a more intensive commercial use.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Dodge v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Triple Cities Shopping Center, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Stanley Depo & Sons, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. Erie County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- DeMarco v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Town of Webb v. Sisters Realty North Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- El Sawah v. Empire State PipelineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Matter of Rochester Genesee Regional Transp. Auth. v. StensrudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.