New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Goldfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this condemnation action respondent refused appellant’s offer of $25,000 and upon trial of the case received an award in the sum of $26,757.45. He appealed therefrom to this court and the award was increased to the sum of $28,678. Upon due application the trial court granted respondent an additional allowance of 5% upon the award and the interest thereon. Appellant contends that this was a simple case for trial; that it is clear that appellant bargained with respondent in good…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dodge v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Board of Supervisors v. Sherlo Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Matter of County of Westchester v. BaruchNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re SchmiederNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- In re the Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walsh v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. 123 Falls Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Hammer LithographAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980