Legal Opinion

New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Goldfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this condemnation action respondent refused appellant’s offer of $25,000 and upon trial of the case received an award in the sum of $26,757.45. He appealed therefrom to this court and the award was increased to the sum of $28,678. Upon due application the trial court granted respondent an additional allowance of 5% upon the award and the interest thereon. Appellant contends that this was a simple case for trial; that it is clear that appellant bargained with respondent in good…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dodge v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Board of Supervisors v. Sherlo Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Matter of County of Westchester v. BaruchNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. In re SchmiederNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In re the Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walsh v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. 123 Falls Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Hammer LithographAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API