Riverside Land Co. v. Jarvis
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, and from an order denying a new trial. P. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The object of the action is to obtain a judgment directing the defendant, Riverside Water Company, to transfer to the plaintiff 154 shares of the capital stock of said defendant Water Company. The certificates outstanding, representing these shares, are in the control and possession of the defendant, Joseph Jarvis, and he refuses to deliver the same to the plaintiff, though requested so to do. The right which the plaintiff claims to these shares is based on the following facts:
The Riverside Water…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- McNulta v. Corn Belt BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- General Securities Corporation v. WeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Casady v. Modern Metal Spinning & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.