Legal Opinion

Nettleton v. Howe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1914No. 11752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Wright, J., entered August 25, 1913, dissolving an attachment, after a hearing upon affidavits.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendants as a community, to recover upon a promissory note for $75, and a balance of $179.43, claimed upon an open 'account. They sued out a writ of attachment, and *33caused it to be levied upon the interest of the defendant Charles H. Howe in certain saw logs. The affidavit for the attachment alleged that the defendant “is about to assign, secrete, and dispose of some of his property with intent to delay and defraud his creditors, and that the defendant is about to convert his property into money for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leake v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hansen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Wild Rose Orchard Co. v. CritzerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jordan v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. O'Brien v. Seattle Ice Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Bank of Goldendale v. BeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hall v. RaettigWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API