Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Doherty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1890No. 53PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. Tlie facts are fully stated in tlie opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

This action was brought by appellants against appellee to recover a balance alleged to be due on account of goods, wares and merchandise sold and deliv*462ered by the former to the latter. An affidavit and bond were duly filed, and a writ of attachment was issued on the following statutory grounds set forth in the affidavit: “ That the defendant is about to convert his property into money for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of his creditors. The said defendant is about to assign, secrete and dispose of his property with intent to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. United States v. CoppersmithUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
  3. Peters v. McPhersonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. O'Brien v. Seattle Ice Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Fawkner, Currie & Co. v. Sanitary Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API