Legal Opinion

Mississippi River Fuel Corporation v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 29, 1940No. 4-5914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

On September 26, 1937, appellee was in the temporary employment of appellant as a casual laborer. The appellant operates a pipe-line for the transportation of natural gas through the State of Arkansas and through White county, with a pumping plant at West Point in said county. It became necessary to do some extra work around its pumping1 plant at West Point and appellant hired for. temporary employment appellee and a number of others living in that vicinity.

Some of these employees had made an excavation around a pressure or header tank which is about 16 inches in diameter and 14 feet long.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins Oil Company of Delaware v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. ElvinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Crockett v. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Southwest Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Sims v. First Nat. Bank, HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Edgar Hutcheson and Lena Hutcheson v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Hutcheson v. Frito-Lay, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
  5. Edgar Hutcheson and Lena Hutcheson v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API