Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Elvins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 26, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The main reliance of counsel for the defendant for a reversal of the judgment is that the plaintiff is bound by the release which he executed in favor of the railroad company. The release recites that, for the sum of $3,500, the plaintiff releases, discharges'"''find receives full satisfaction of all damages for personal injuries growing out of the accident in question.

In 48 A. L. R. 1464, it is said that the general rule is that a release of damages for personal injuries "cannot be avoided on the ground of mistake merely because the injuries prove more…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of North America v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HambrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Hurst v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Bush v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Faye Hendrix Vickers, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Ray Hendrix, Deceased v. Gifford-Hill & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Garrett v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gaster v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Turchi v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API