Russell v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Quinton A. Russell was convicted of first degree sexual abuse (rape) pursuant to D.C.Code § 22-4102 (1996 Repl.), a new statute which became effective on the very day of the incident for which Russell was charged. 1 In this appeal Russell contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by instructing the jury that he bore the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim consented to the sexual act. 2 Russell also contends that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that it must consider any evidence relating to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Knight v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.