Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1997No. 95-CF-147PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Associate Judge:

Quinton A. Russell was convicted of first degree sexual abuse (rape) pursuant to D.C.Code § 22-4102 (1996 Repl.), a new statute which became effective on the very day of the incident for which Russell was charged. 1 In this appeal Russell contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by instructing the jury that he bore the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim consented to the sexual act. 2 Russell also contends that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that it must consider any evidence relating to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Knight v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  5. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API