People v. Haugh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
Appellant was convicted on the first count of an information containing two counts. The second count was dismissed on motion of the district attorney and the appellant appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
In so far as the objections to the sufficiency of the evidence is concerned, there was legally sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the verdict of the jury.
The objection, however, to the following instruction, referring to the testimony of the defendant, is evidently well taken: “No greater presumption attaches in favor of his testimony than attaches…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. SmittcampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. LaMantainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.